| Their
financial model is hopelessly smashed, based on Republican free-lunch
ideology, kept afloat with escalating debt and unsustainably high loan
payments pushed off into the future. There's no financial plan they can
put together that will salvage the extension of the 241 South of Ortega
Highway. At an estimated $1.2 billion, the construction and financing
cost is too expensive, and with declining revenues and increasing bond
payments on their existing franchise in a declining economy, all their
lobbyists, financial advisers, and consultants won't manage to produce
a spreadsheet that bond-buyers will believe after the Panic of 2008.
There's probably no route that can satisfy the surfers, planners,
developers, existing homeowners, and nearby Marines at Camp Pendleton.
When you're talking about the loss of the last wild beach, sullying the
last pristine creek, loss of a campground and habitat that was donated
as mitigation for other development, there isn't a lot of room for
compromise.San Mateo Creek and Trestles are the Yosemite of surfing.
What's at stake are habitat and lands that were set aside as
mitigation for previous development and the SONGS nuclear plant. Toll
road proponents spent years tinkering with the plans to lessen the
impacts, and at the last minute offered 100 million dollars in a
mitigation fund for the loss of the park land, but a coalition of
environmental groups has joined with the Surfriders to make a last
stand here, and their arguments have prevailed with the Coastal
Commission.
But even if there were some environmentally acceptable
alternative, there's no market for the bonds they need to sell to
create over-priced toll roads in the 21st century. The 1980's style
planning depended on North San Diego county residents hurrying to a new
international airport at El Toro, but the death of that plan was really
the defining moment for the future of the 241 South.
Even a non-compete clause that exacerbates congestion and
extorts public money for any improvement to the 5 wouldn't be enough to
force tolls high enough to make this work. Tolls per mile on the
existing system are already high, and adding 1.2 billion dollars in
additional payments to the cost structure will push tolls on the
proposed segments to unsustainable levels.
Financial Turmoil
In press accounts of the battle over the extension of the 241,
the Foothill South Agency is referred to as the "more successful" of
the two TCA toll road entities, but this is slight praise indeed in
comparison to the SJC/73.
In January the Fitch rating agency lowered the outlook on the
Foothill Eastern to "negative" while preserving the existing bond
rating of BBB.
Unlike the SJC/73, the Foothill Eastern has, at least until
recently, met their forecasts for ridership and revenue, and has had
enough money to siphon 30 million dollars a year from their funds to
keep the SJC/73 afloat for the last three years, with a promise of
another 30 million this year, and an open-ended promise of loaning up
to a billion dollars from excess revenues.
But now revenues at FETCA are dropping even faster than those
on the SJH.73. For the first half of 2008-2009 fiscal year revenues
were off 8.3% over the previous year. An agency that boasted of
hitting 105.9% of projected revenues in FY2007 and fell to 93.6% of
projected revenues last year will be lucky to hit 84% of projected
revenues this year. When your financial models are based on accreting
debt and rapidly rising finance payments in later years, this is grim
news indeed.
TCA flacks treat this as a blip, and they have a model with a
recession scenario, but they still can't imagine a fundamental shift in
the Southland economy that echoes our national deep recession. Much of
TCA/FETCA's revenue relies on peak-hour commuters from the Inland
Empire, where the congestion and the lack of competitive routes has
bolstered traffic. Jobs in Orange County and housing in Riverside
County have followed an historical pattern with housing there and jobs
here, but that pattern may be collapsing, as some of the biggest
employment drivers in our region - real estate, finance, and
construction - have shed jobs aggressively. Simultaneously, the people
who have been buying those inland empire homes are finding that the
values have plummeted while their payments have skyrocketed.
Emails back and forth to TIFIA, a federal infrastructure
financing agency, indicated that neither TCA entity has any access to
financial markets without a major federal financial guarantee, and the
diseased SJC/73 is a conundrum.
From a September TCA email to TIFIA,when financial markets were much healthier than they are now,
a.) The structure of the Foothill Eastern's
standalone financing (even assuming a $400 million loan), is
challenging at best and unmarketable at worst and b) the San Joaquin
Hills TCA does not have market access.
FETCA has been propping up the SJC73 and attempting to roll all
debts from both agencies into a huge new loan package with 1.2 billion
dollars in federal guarantees, because if the sister agency defaults,
FETCA's projections and plans will face intense negative scrutiny. But
by propping it up with unsustainable toll increases for their own
patrons, FETCA may be dooming their own future.
But FETCA can't justify continuing their subsidy of their
sister agency if the justification for the bailout is gone. Don't
forget that the 120 million in transfers and the loan guarantee were
based on compensating the SJC/73 for traffic that they would lose when
the Foothill South was completed. It's illegal under the California
State Constitution for a public agency to make such a massive gift of
public funds once the foundation for their tortured logic becomes
impractical.
The Greenbelt Option
One
option for FETCA would be to pull the plug on the 241 South
immediately, enforce the cancellation clause of their bailout agreement
with the SJC/73, and start planning for a different future. Combined
with some belt-tightening at TCA headquarters as the armies of lawyers,
flacks, and consultants are sent packing, this should free up enough
money for the FETCA to lower tolls and focus on a new end-game that
would require less construction money, address real South County
problems, and accelerate the date when the toll roads become free.
Ironically, the best opportunity for both agencies may come from the alternative Beltway plan
that has been proposed by toll road opponents. This is a fascinating
alternative, developed by activists with active input from traffic
engineering professionals that offers real hope in addressing the real
traffic problems of the south-county cities. An east-west connection
joins the 73 to the 241, and takes some of the traffic off of local
roads.
Will this work, either financially or practically? It's hard to tell
without study, but it may be time to take a close look at this
alternative.
A Realistic Plan for Widening I-5
To actually relieve congestion on the I-5 corridor, the Beltway
proponents also recommend that state and regional planners, without any
involvement from TCA, start planning to augment the capacity of the 5
through San Clemente.
From a letter to the governator:
As members of the stakeholders committee to the South Orange County
Major Investment Study by the OC Transportation Authority, we assert
that significant and irreversible environmental effects from this road
extension do not justify its questionable utility to the overall
transportation network. Studies done by Smart Mobility, Inc. and other
traffic engineers illustrate that improvement of I-5 with a
community-sensitive design would reduce right-of-way impacts. And in
any event, considering the growth of intra-regional traffic, this
freeway corridor must be upgraded, smoothing out the curves and grade
changes, providing room to underground the LOS-SAN rail corridor so
necessary to goods and human movement for the coming decades.
Despite TCA disinformation, an augmented I-5 plan uses exactly the
same types of concepts that are a precondition for the OCTA's widening
the 405 from Euclid to the 605, and follow the practices safely used in
every major urban area. Instead of starting with the standard expansive
Caltrans designs that were developed when raw land was dirt cheap, you
begin by examining your existing right-of-way and figuring out how to
squeeze the most capacity into that space without sacrificing safety.
There are dozens of tricks that highway engineers have used in other
urban areas - different styles of interchanges, narrower shoulders and
breakdown lanes, some lanes 11 feet wide instead of 12, barriers
between lanes instead of wide separations, shifting the centerline of
the freeway slightly, cheating a little on the adjoining frontage
roads, allowing less room for landscaping.
Changing Attitudes
Admitting defeat for the 241 extension will not be easy for
Orange County Republicans. Their aggressive anti-tax posture in the
state and Federal legislature only works if they aren't reliant on
compromises that might bring infrastructure money back into Orange
County. As long as South County Republicans could count on
privatization of the toll roads, they had far less incentive to
compromise on any other issues with Democrats from the rest of the
state. If the toll roads experiment collapses, and the system is shown
to have been as fraudulent as the rest of the kleptocratic agenda of
the Reagan and Bush years, then Republicans might need to come to the
table on all of the issues, especially revenue enhancement.
As one toll-road opponent told me, following this story has
been about following the intellectual history of the country, through
this window on the machinations of the people who led the early Reagan
revolution. The hollowing out of America, the savage attacks on
government per se, the idea that public goods could be privatized and
piratized, came as much as anywhere from Orange County.
And the death of the toll roads may be our signal that hope and
change are on the way, even here, even now, even in Orange County.
|